From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Sep 17 14:21:24 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA26769
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 14:21:24 -0700
Received: from miller.cs.uwm.edu (miller.cs.uwm.edu [129.89.35.13])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA26764
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 14:21:22 -0700
Received: (from james@localhost) by miller.cs.uwm.edu (8.6.10/8.6.10) id QAA09851; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 16:21:20 -0500
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 16:21:20 -0500
From: Jim Lowe <james@miller.cs.uwm.edu>
Message-Id: <199509172121.QAA09851@miller.cs.uwm.edu>
To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: Sound driver in 2.1 / 2.2..
Cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org, multimedia@rah.star-gate.com
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
> When the CS4231 side of things gets smooth out we will make /dev/dsp0 
> and /dev/dsp1 access the CS4231 side of the GUS, if there are no
> technical objections;additionally, if /dev/dsp2 and /dev/dsp3 could
> then access the GF1 side of things.

The only objection I can think of would be the mixer.  Can the
cs4231 mixer control the synth and midi side of things or is that controlled
by the GF1 mixer code?  If it the latter, then things can get confusing if
one has a gus vs gus-max card.

	-Jim