From owner-freebsd-smp  Thu Jan 30 00:52:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA28984
          for smp-outgoing; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clem.systemsix.com (clem.systemsix.com [198.99.86.131])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA28979
          for <smp@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clem.systemsix.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id BAA15052; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 01:52:14 -0700
Message-Id: <199701300852.BAA15052@clem.systemsix.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: clem.systemsix.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
From: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
To: Randy DuCharme <randyd@nconnect.net>
cc: smp@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Dumb cvsup question 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:30:58 CST."
             <32F04022.41C67EA6@nconnect.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 01:52:14 -0700
Sender: owner-smp@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

> Greetings,
> 
> I've been supping current almost nightly and I've been noticing a lot of
> kernel source updates in current.  Should I be including these in the 
> SMP sources ??  I've been keeping them separate thus far.

I would strongly suggest you continue to keep them seperate.  In fact, by
supping -current you run the risk of your "world" getting out of sync with
your "sys" tree and introducing subtle problems.
--
Steve Passe	| powered by
smp@csn.net	|            FreeBSD