From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  5 12:48:51 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5160810656A4;
	Tue,  5 Jun 2012 12:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@vniz.net)
Received: from vniz.net (vniz.net [194.87.13.69])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5EC8FC1D;
	Tue,  5 Jun 2012 12:48:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vniz.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q55CmmN2013623;
	Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:48:49 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@vniz.net)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by localhost (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q55Cmm7G013622;
	Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:48:48 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from ache)
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:48:47 +0400
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120605124847.GB13306@vniz.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>,
	Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>,
	Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.ORG>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <201206042134.q54LYoVJ067685@svn.freebsd.org>
	<4FCDBE69.6080906@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120605083553.GH85127@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120605083553.GH85127@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG,
	src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r236582 - head/lib/libc/stdlib
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
	<svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:48:51 -0000


--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:35:53AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Not to mention that the patch was committed to _our_ implementation of
> libc, which uses _our_ free, and not some abstract free(3). Our free chan=
ging
> errno means that process state is so messed that worrying about realpath(=
3)
> correctness is beyond any expectations.

We can't stay with "our free" concept but with "some abstract free"=20
instead. The code must be portable and even "our free" can be replaced in=
=20
the future.

About errno changing, look at "our free" code pass, potential candidates=20
(as Garrett mentions) are utrace, assert, idalloc - I don't look deep to=20
say for sure. But it does not really matter because the whole "our free"=20
concept is flawed.

> I already described my POV to ache, but it seems that nobody listens. It =
just
> a season, it seems.

You deside to not answer to the free() discussion which follows your=20
initial commit, which means either you agree with change or you are not=20
interested. It looks strange that you just consider to answer now and keep=
=20
silence at the time of discussion.

--=20
http://ache.vniz.net/

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/OAC8ACgkQVg5YK5ZEdN2BOwCgqT9ce0JL6k9QvfXN6DjGP87x
xFEAnRZQAuX2VFJsrT9WzRGguCHO9d2E
=uKtO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--