From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 19:09:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31E316A400 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA0613C43E for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([85.172.12.219]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id l2QJ8hH4019929; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:08:53 +0400 (MSD) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HVuYf-0000Fp-LY; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:08:45 +0400 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <11780964@bsam.ru> <20070324230735.mniaxvuq044o0sog@webmail.leidinger.net> <01060071@bsam.ru> <20070325212347.770f4551@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <34958083@bsam.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:08:45 +0400 In-Reply-To: <34958083@bsam.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:33:16 +0400") Message-ID: <99270418@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] bsd.linux-rpm.mk: PKGNAMEPREFIX for FC6 ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:09:02 -0000 On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:33:16 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:23:47 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Boris Samorodov (Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:59:52 +0300): > > > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:07:35 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > Quoting Boris Samorodov (from Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:14:35 +0300): > > > > > > > > For upcoming FC6 ports I propose to use PKGNAMEPREFIX=linux-fc6- > > > > > > > Would it make sense to do this for all fedora based ports, even for > > > > fc4 (I talk about linux-fc4 obviously)? > > > > > > When we were changing default linux_base (at least the last time) we > > > had changed all infrostructure ports as well at once. There had been > > > no need to create other ports. With linux_base-fc6 introduction it > > > should be another play: both linux_base ports will coexist for a long > > > time (along with their infrostructure ports). > > > > > > About fc4 ports. Have to think a little... > > > > > > > Do we gain something from this? Maybe some consistence for the future? > > > > > > Yes, it seems to me a bad idea to have two packages with the same name > > > but for different linux_base ports. And for sure a consistence play a > > > good role here. > > I don't question the fc6 part. My question was more "Do we gain > > something when we add fc4 as well?". > Ah, I see. Maybe I'll get a question in some days after playing with ^^^^^^^^ Sorry, should be "an answer" here. > new fc6-ports (with packaging, conflicts, etc.). WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve