From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 16 06:15:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78550C04 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yoshi.bluerosetech.com (yoshi.bluerosetech.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a450::66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CEEB190F for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (c-71-236-222-167.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.236.222.167]) by yoshi.bluerosetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E74B9E6069; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:15:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:1680:cf0:71da:c451:e6df:6090] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:1680:cf0:71da:c451:e6df:6090]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1696D2EC; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:15:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52AE9A75.9090209@bluerosetech.com> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:15:17 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-RC1 ISO image too big References: <20131214095001.GV13385@equilibrium.bsdes.net> <52AD0F73.5050905@ShaneWare.Biz> <20131215105736.51c51073@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20131215105736.51c51073@X220.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:15:20 -0000 On 12/14/2013 6:57 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Any reason you need cd media? > > it is not the CD media, it is simply the bandwidth needed. There are > many FreeBSD people around this globe which do not have the luck of a > 100MBit/s connection. Every byte which is not on a media counts here. Your argument doesn't make sense. If they need to minimize downloading, they should down the bootonly image and fetch/create packages for the ports they need. Anything else is going to spend bytes downloading things they won't use.