From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 21 09:23:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14A516A420 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:23:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C200743D4C for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1L9NOwe023907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:23:24 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k1L9NOjp023906 for hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:23:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:23:24 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060221092324.GA23739@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20060220172730.GA61906@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20060220174250.GA35343@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060220174250.GA35343@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 147.229.10.14 Cc: Subject: Re: LDFLAGS setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:23:28 -0000 On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:42:50PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-20 18:27, Divacky Roman wrote: > > hi > > > > is is possible to set global LDFLAGS as its possible with CFLAGS? > > Yes, but why would you want to do this? It is very likely to create > dependencies with libraries that are not really used by all programs. I was just curious. man ld promises some optimizations and thats what I am interested in: LDFLAGS=-O1 --sort-common -z combreloc --relax but this doesnt seem to work with autoconf :( roman