From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 07:06:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E010516A4CE; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:06:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45C243D1F; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:06:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 3135C530D; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:06:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id C5F34530C; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:06:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 56EE433C6F; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:06:44 +0100 (CET) To: Stijn Hoop References: <20040209140031.GT14639@garage.freebsd.pl> <11981.1076337136@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040209150039.GS2803@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:06:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040209150039.GS2803@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> (Stijn Hoop's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:00:39 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: drosih@rpi.edu cc: julian@elischer.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Review/Test: Pseudo-device unit number management patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:06:53 -0000 Stijn Hoop writes: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:32:16PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Please also remember: /dev is _not_ an inventory of available devices. > Just curious: what is it then? An inventory of available drivers? An > inventory of open devices? What it always has been: a collection of device nodes, some of which may correspond to existing devices. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no