From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 24 23:28: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9657C14C81 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 23:28:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id XAA83473 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 23:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 23:27:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Alpha/PC98/ i4b patches Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been moving devfs forward to match PHK's latest changes, however there are some files I cannot test. These effect the ISDN stack, the alpha port and the PC98 code. If you can test these, apply the patch file found at http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/ and let me know if it breaks anything. If you don't compile DEVFS you shouldn't see any changes. if you do you should see devices as per normal in a devfs. I'm more interested in just checking that they don't break the NON_devfs case at the moment. but I can't test those 3 cases. Could anyone who can test those parts let me know if they are safe, so I can check them in? Until I can check them (and a couple of others) in, I can't make some API changes to DEVFS that make it less intrusive. julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message