Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:48:32 -0700 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> Subject: Re: Proposed rework of autotools call structure from port Makefiles Message-ID: <42B23A00.8000304@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1118974632.38321.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <42B21E9D.80709@FreeBSD.org> <42B22473.3000001@magnesium.net> <42B22ABE.8090105@FreeBSD.org> <1118974632.38321.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Just clarification. Would, for example, libtool15:env be equivalent to > USE_INC_LIBTOOL_VER=15? I'm trying to get a handle on this :env thing. > I have to agree with Adam that WANT_AUTOTOOLS is a bit of a misnomer. > However, I'm not sure this :env suffix is very clear either. Maybe it > just needs some getting used to... Actually no, for the special case of the USE_INC_LIBTOOL_VER, things would have to be extended with, eg: libtool15:inc I did completely miss that in my original write up. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42B23A00.8000304>