From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 15 8:44: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from energyhq.homeip.net (213-97-200-73.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.200.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D2D37B404; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:43:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from there (kajsa.energyhq.org [192.168.0.1]) by energyhq.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EE6E23F1D; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:43:54 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Miguel Mendez Organization: Energy HQ To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: devfs? Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:43:35 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020115091211.7B91F23F17@energyhq.homeip.net> <20020115082813.B792@citusc17.usc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020115082813.B792@citusc17.usc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020115164354.5EE6E23F1D@energyhq.homeip.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday 15 January 2002 17:28, Kris Kennaway wrote: > mount_devfs should have been removed some time ago when the broken > devfs code was removed from 4.x. /etc/rc.devfs is also a dead file > and should be removed. > > 5.0-current has a functioning implementation of devfs. Yes, that's what made me think it might have been MFC'ed from -CURRENT because my system running -CURRENT has devfs. Thanks. -- Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net EnergyHQ :: http://energyhq.homeip.net FreeBSD - The power to serve! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message