From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 06:18:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5885C37B401; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from azrael.nucflash.com (azrael.nucflash.com [66.220.23.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECA943FD7; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:18:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wesman@nucflash.com) Received: from azrael.nucflash.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by azrael.nucflash.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h77DIn7e022580; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wesman@localhost) by azrael.nucflash.com (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h77DInQS022579; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:18:49 -0700 From: Wesley Horner To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20030807131849.GA22569@nucflash.com> References: <20030807062536.GA68747@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030807063210.GA72779@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030807064426.GA69176@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030807064426.GA69176@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: sparc64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ponderous 'make world' times post GCC 3.3... X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:18:53 -0000 On Wed Aug 06 at 11:44:26 PM, David O'Brien wrote: > It has been argued by Richard Henderson (urber GCC hacker) that 3.3 is no > slower than 3.2. I'm now thinking that this is a cache-size issue. I > wonder if GCC is blowing out my tiny 256KB cache. Not likely. I got almost an itenticle slowdown on a duel e250. I know the cus in that have at least 2 megs of cache each. It is just slow. Wes -- ~~~~wesman@nucflash.com~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My old sig was about Vaxen and VMS but I can't even figure out the name of the company that owns them anymore.