Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:57:17 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/26092: ksh93 port not installing properly Message-ID: <20010618175717.E64693@leviathan.inethouston.net> In-Reply-To: <200106182255.f5IMt5O42475@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200106182241.f5IMfnL41136@freefall.freebsd.org> <200106182255.f5IMt5O42475@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 03:55:05PM -0700, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote: > >>>>> writes: > > > There is currently no proper way to populate /etc/shells because > > ports aren't supposed to touch anything outside of /usr/local > > Some ports make changes outside /usr/local. Look at the bash port: it > updates properly /etc/shells, which is a good thing. > It does, but is it supposed to? I'm sure I'm probably wrong, but I was in the understanding ports don't touch anything outside /usr/local or their PREFIX. I know bash does, but is it supposed to? -- David W. Chapman Jr. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010618175717.E64693>