Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:38:42 +0300
From:      Yousef Raffah <yraffah@savola.com>
To:        Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc:        freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Interrupt Storms on irq:11 with Tecra A4
Message-ID:  <1156149522.1036.13.camel@redevil.savola.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1060809001502.14085B-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.1060809001502.14085B-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-jUKfAWT/HKnSvfoscQ1L
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 01:09 +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Yousef Raffah wrote:
>  > John Baldwin wrote:
>  > > On Sunday 06 August 2006 05:01, Yousef Raffah wrote:
>  > >  =20
>  > >> Thank you very much John for your great help and support. Now that =
I
>  > >> have the patch working, do I need to remove the entries
>  > >> hw.pci.link.LNKG.irq=3D11
>  > >> hw.pci.link.LNKH.irq=3D11
>  > >>
>  > >> from my /boot/loader.conf?
>  > >>    =20
>  > >
>  > > No.  The patch lets those entries actually work, so leave them there=
. :)
>  > >
>  > >  =20
>  > OK
>  > >> I assume I have to do this every time I buildworld, right?
>  > >>    =20
>  > >
>  > > No, I'll commit the patch and once it is MFC'd you won't have to re-=
apply it=20
>  > > after running cvsup.  Until then, you will have to apply it each tim=
e after=20
>  > > you cvsup.  I think you can ignore the 'unretryable' errors from cd0=
 btw.
>=20
> John: does anything much still get MFC'd back to 5-STABLE these days?=20
> Are there any reasons not to go to 6 with old kit that works well with
> APM (esp suspend/resume) but not so far with ACPI?  (ref: '99 Compaq
> Armada 1500c)
>=20
>  > This is great news, thank you so much :)=20
>=20
> Yousef: good to see perseverance further!
>=20
> Just curious .. was that DB-25 on your Tecra a parallel port after all?
> And if so, has fixing this interrupt storm problem fixed ppc0 detection?
>=20
I'm sorry Ian, I was going through my old messages and suddenly saw
yours :)
yes, the DB-25 is a parallel port. However, the fix for the interrupt
storm did not fix detecting the ppc0.
dmesg | grep -i ppc0
ppc0: parallel port not found

> Cheers, Ian
>=20

--=-jUKfAWT/HKnSvfoscQ1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBE6XESqG4sHeIU6qURAv76AKC/HgzSXUAIgExjbc96D6U9zDffcwCdH05E
5na+BQyUIiIdkjGestwJkZU=
=44f/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-jUKfAWT/HKnSvfoscQ1L--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1156149522.1036.13.camel>