From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 31 01:19:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B41F16A420; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:19:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE6643D45; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:19:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6E646BD4; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:18:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:20:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey In-Reply-To: <20060131010335.GQ91655@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: <20060131011942.D95776@fledge.watson.org> References: <200601301233.k0UCXiKq085748@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060130123525.GD83922@FreeBSD.org> <20060130215816.GC91655@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20060130235717.J95776@fledge.watson.org> <20060131005711.GB16211@comp.chem.msu.su> <20060131010335.GQ91655@wantadilla.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Yar Tikhiy , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Matteo Riondato Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults periodic.conf X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:19:01 -0000 On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > It's actually heartening to see so many people agreeing with me on this one; > I wasn't expecting it. While I'm sure there is a contingent that disagrees with you on principle, people's true loyalties are always to arbitrarily long and high precision integers :-). I agree that making it configurable is probably the right answer, since I can see good arguments both ways. Robert N M Watson