From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 19:53:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF2E16A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2702843D2F for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:53:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost.nic.fr [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBU3rnDa009286 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:53:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBU3rnGS009283; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:53:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:53:49 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200312300353.hBU3rnGS009283@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Doug White In-Reply-To: <20031229194648.S27691@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20031223084804.GA59462@Amber.XtremeDev.com> <20031224084858.GA12660@Amber.XtremeDev.com> <20031229194648.S27691@carver.gumbysoft.com> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 05:03:42 -0800 cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ImageMagick on 5.2-RC1 fails with pthread error (libkse) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 03:53:52 -0000 < said: > That sounds like libtool is doing the Wrong Thing in the threads > selection, probably because the port needs to be updated to the newer > threads framework. It wouldn't be the first time libfool had gotten something completely wrong. -GAWollman