From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 13:09:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CCB148 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814E329B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-45-17.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.45.17]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3023CBA2; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:09:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r0MD9qN8003281; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:09:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:09:52 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Ralf Mardorf" Subject: Re: Upgrading 8.2 to 9.1, Gnome issue Message-Id: <20130122140952.39097a50.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20130121224248.GA75986@whisperer.chthonixia.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:09:51 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:59:44 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:22:04 +0100, Hrisikesh sahu > wrote: > > #portupgrade gnome2 > > Is there a future for GNOME 2 on FreeBSD? I assume -- on the _long_ run -- Gnome 2 will be dead, just as Gnome 1, KDE 1 and 2, and XFCE (capitals, so it "obviously" means version 3). MATE and Cinnamon are still maintained, and if there will be FreeBSD ports, they will probably work for some time, until eventually the required support libraries at certain levels of abstraction will not work (or even build) anymore, or when security concerns grow enough to abolish the port. Infrastructures are moving on, and backwards compatibility isn't the biggest strength of desktop environments. :-( -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...