From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 10 17:20:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486F11065672 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solko@solko.sk) Received: from zmail.bubble.eu (zmail.bubble.eu [81.89.56.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935F98FC2C for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmail.bubble.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE859BCC; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:19:58 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zmail.bubble.eu Received: from zmail.bubble.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmail.bubble.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-05EBZiwnLC; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:19:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from zmail.bubble.eu (zmail.bubble.eu [81.89.56.104]) by zmail.bubble.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9F69BC7; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:19:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:19:58 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Sol=C4=8Diansky?= To: Odhiambo Washington Message-ID: <2002642622.1673.1265822398406.JavaMail.root@zmail.bubble.eu> In-Reply-To: <1166351073.1670.1265822384671.JavaMail.root@zmail.bubble.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [193.87.17.5] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.4_GA_2040.FreeBSD_amd64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/6.0.4_GA_2040.FreeBSD_amd64) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: All-in-one Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:20:01 -0000 ----- "Odhiambo Washington" wrote: You could try zimbra for all-in-one-email-solution instead of Citadel or Horde+, that would solve most of the problems as it integrates all the bits you need into a one working opensource bundle. > > You can always write something to manage your firewall (like zimlet to zimbra) and that greatly depends on your expectations. I don't change firewall rules very often on my zimbra box but then again, i am the ascii lover ;). > > kind regards, > > s. > > You run Zimbra on FreeBSD? Let me see the guide you followed in order to do that although I don't love Zimbra that much because accessing it via the web requires so much bandwidth - unless this changed. I have seen http://wiki.zimbra.com/index.php?title=Installing_GNR_on_FreeBSD_7.2_i386 but wonder if you run the latest zimbra on your FreeBSD. Does it meet my requirements? I ported zimbra to freebsd starting with 5.0.16 which is still running on one of my boxes. It was a patch designed to run - not for full integration and I lost my interest back then. Starting with zimbra 6 i made a complete rewrite of the source tree to support freebsd natively, meaning no more crude hacks. I have been using and maintaining the wiki+patch since then (because i spent years looking for all-in-one-email freebsd solution). Zimbra team is pretty open to new ideas but there is no reason to support freebsd with no freebsd user-base. Use zimbra, we might get it once. Hell, it is supported on mac.. I am running 6.0.4 in production and I will gladly help anyone with installation. Linux rules the commercial skies nowadays so every little bit helps. There is *absolutely* no reason for zimbra not to run correctly on freebsd because 99% of the code is fully portable, leaving behind only some linux-specific-scripts for statistics (disk,memory etc.). Please check http://www.zimbra.com/forums/installation/33477-zcs-6-0-1-ported-freebsd7.html for more info. Zimbra offers mobile, html, ajax web interface. If your users prefer simple visual interface go for squirrelmail. Sadly, most users prefer flashy fancy stuff. s.