From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 00:03:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D561AA1 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048B8284F for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r7M03Z5a013747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:03:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: dig From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:03:35 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <44733A0D-5BAD-43B9-B154-554A35260089@lafn.org> References: <5215514F.4030303@fjl.co.uk> To: Frank Leonhardt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:03:39 -0000 On 21 August 2013, at 17:02, Doug Hardie wrote: >=20 > On 21 August 2013, at 16:46, Frank Leonhardt wrote: >=20 >> On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote: >>> There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. = I believe its also in 9.1. The command: >>>=20 >>> dig freebsd.org +trace >>>=20 >>> Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. = Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with = lots of useful information. >>> _______________________________________________ >>>=20 >>=20 >> Works for me on 9.0 and 9.1 (and 8.2, 7.1, 7.0) >>=20 >> Is there something wrong with your local bind configuration? >>=20 >> Regards, Frank. >=20 > No. The 7.2 config is identical to the 9.1 and there is no bind = running on the 9.2. >=20 >=20