Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:32:04 -0700 From: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SQL in the base system (Was: New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps))) Message-ID: <20070512063204.GA58563@lizzy.catnook.local> In-Reply-To: <20070511191612.GA50329@lizzy.catnook.local> References: <200705102105.27271.blackdragon@highveldmail.co.za> <f20c8u$htp$1@sea.gmane.org> <4643C7DB.6000408@elischer.org> <f219f6$3ls$1@sea.gmane.org> <17988.35412.231093.411177@bhuda.mired.org> <20070511165612.GA48097@lizzy.catnook.local> <17988.43279.93248.608136@bhuda.mired.org> <20070511191612.GA50329@lizzy.catnook.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:16:12PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:34:07PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
[snip]
> > > > How about portability - can I move the file to a completely
> > > > different architecture and still get the data from it?
[snip]
The answer ("Yes") can be found in this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg00120.html
As another data point, `yum' has been using SQLite for quite some time now.
--
Jos Backus
jos at catnook.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070512063204.GA58563>