From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 19:23:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441CF106564A for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:23:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F9A8FC15 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2010 15:23:42 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.8-GA) with ESMTP id QRA88624; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:23:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2010 15:23:41 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19409.62396.701618.860484@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:23:40 -0400 To: Jim Trigg In-Reply-To: <20100423184904.GE9863@spamcop.net> References: <19409.58999.623809.616876@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20100423184904.GE9863@spamcop.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, scheidell@secnap.net, Robert Huff Subject: Re: revisiting Spamassassin problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:23:42 -0000 Jim Trigg writes: > > Back in February there was a thread - "spamassassin problem > > with upgrade" - about spamd failing to start with this error: > > > > child process [76967] exited or timed out without signaling production of > > a PID file: exit 255 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2588. > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd: WARNING: failed to start spamd > > > > The thread offered no definite solution except to downgrade. > > Is this still the case? > > When I've seen that, it's meant that I needed to run sa-update to > rebuild the rule database (I think it is). I'm not sure why, but this seems to have done it. Thanks, and sorry for the noise. Respectfully, Robert Huff