From owner-freebsd-office@freebsd.org Sun Jan 8 05:24:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18664CA5F33 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 05:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C241742 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 05:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F25C3CA5F31; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 05:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: office@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04BFCA5F30 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 05:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E00111741 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 05:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v085Oa5F018234 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 05:24:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200020] [patch] editors/libreoffice: enable build on powerpc64 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 05:24:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: hamiltcl@verizon.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 05:24:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D200020 --- Comment #14 from Curtis Hamilton --- I see. Using a jail is a good idea, as long as the jail environment is comparable to the live environment. However, different versions of runtime libraries can cause undesired behaviors. I have the luxury of having two separate systems for building and testing. >From what you've stated, I do believe what you are seeing is the difference= in the stdc++ libs used by GCC49 and /usr/bin/gcc. Especially, if 'usr/bin/gcc= ' is the stock GCC distribution. That is why I asked about '/etc/libmap.conf.' Y= ou can perform a quick check by checking for the presence, or absence, of 'GLIBCXX_3.4.18' by doing the following: strings /usr/lib/libstdc++*|grep GLIBCXX I've had this happen to me when building a port on one system and installin= g on another, after upgrading GCC on the build system.=20 BTW, what version of FreeBSD are you using? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=