From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 24 02:23:00 2010
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD002106566C;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from onemda@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91E08FC1B;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:22:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1437549wwf.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=qfYnfqEOKklY/7aEhLyskpPotHljiWs3A4ri216tTpI=;
	b=X9k8XEBr9rH43YYc01+tcWO3QG0l3u0AbbwE5mhVzz5FZKB3CVyf1qu3amVnOTQpmB
	KZ+WJ612nKRDD96a58rg+mjHPa15YSaEsNnaEIEMYvvQe0YtdGQF+DKAohbEFrQLVY3o
	JY1WXjLrpRpJOrxDRhQWaqcctYYDyYSwlpcSU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=dPfl2Z4vgj5iT7w2OJWm7E5jhU0/AlGPr6TOGKA1dkYRCA3MWgMvdWfDnhYl8cUfBb
	2nohalHQYuWjBBdv355fVrUMlyURNOccEDvyS3/IkM+6s9HWRkk64CbgamNoZ5r+rbdI
	yzt19M4wcJA0i86ZIKdNP0U05O9bUpJ+5KYbU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.87.67 with SMTP id x45mr942426wee.18.1269397378290; Tue, 
	23 Mar 2010 19:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20100323205117.GG2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References: <201003221152.o2MBqs9M012769@svn.freebsd.org>
	<201003220849.36246.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<20100322152334.GA24534@sandvine.com> <20100323192131.GF32142@hoeg.nl>
	<20100323200253.GF2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<3a142e751003231335x58179a0aqcbd6ea328c04409d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100323205117.GG2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:22:57 +0100
Message-ID: <3a142e751003231922q39386b7elb6cd6945652a7291@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, src-committers@freebsd.org,
	Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>,
	svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
	<svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:23:00 -0000

On 3/23/10, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:35:09PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 3/23/10, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
>> >> * Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> >> > I was just about to follow up with a comment to that effect.  We do
>> >> > want
>> >> > it to become a panic, but I would prefer to hold off until we address
>> >> > the known issue with padlock(4).
>> >>
>> >> I have seen this message appear when using the ndisulator as well. How
>> >> are we going to solve it in this case? Could the ndisulator be extended
>> >> to prepare a FPU context using kib's new API?
>> >
>> > I looked at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa489566.aspx
>> > after someone mentioned ndisulator. It seems that windows requires
>> > that i386 drivers carefully use braces for use of FPU, while amd64
>> > code allowed to use it freely. That suggests that windows clears
>> > TS on kernel mode entry or driver calls, that seems to be too
>> > wastefull.
>> >
>> > I would very much appreciate the help with changing both ndis and
>> > padlock to use fpu_kern_enter/leave KPI, since I do not use them.
>> > I need some time to polish the patch before.
>> >
>>
>> I saw fpudna only on amd64, but I never managed to get ndisulator
>> fully working on amd64 (at least with broadcom card/driver).
>
> I cannot find KeSaveFloatingPointState symbol defined by ndisulator.
> Could it be that it is a macro or inline function that expands to
> proper assembly for i386, and nop on amd64 ? That would explain
> your observation.

I have never found any driver that reports such symbol missing when loaded.