From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 6 0:29:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.netcologne.de (mail2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83AB37B659; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 00:29:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pherman@frenchfries.net) Received: from bagabeedaboo.security.at12.de (dial-195-14-226-38.netcologne.de [195.14.226.38]) by mail2.netcologne.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11131; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:29:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost.security.at12.de [127.0.0.1]) by bagabeedaboo.security.at12.de (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e667T7f00468; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:29:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:29:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul Herman To: Bill Fumerola Cc: Blaz Zupan , Will Andrews , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does In-Reply-To: <20000705135801.P4034@jade.chc-chimes.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:56:43PM +0200, Blaz Zupan wrote: > > > this number is completely useless to me. I have to agree with Sheldon, where > > is the use to this number? > > Think about doing something like > > $ df -c/disk0 /disk1 /disk2 ... /diskX > > To just monitor a cluster of disks. I'm all for adding options to get features you can't otherwise get (even *IF* the use of "total" is debatable), but c'mon, this is an awk one-liner. I would agree with Sheldon as well. Let this one go. -Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message