From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 17:00:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2498216A5EC for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@gaiahost.coop) Received: from biodiesel.gaiahost.coop (biodiesel.gaiahost.coop [64.95.78.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A0543D67 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@gaiahost.coop) Received: from gaiahost.coop (host-64-65-195-19.spr.choiceone.net [::ffff:64.65.195.19]) (AUTH: LOGIN mark@hubcapconsulting.com) by biodiesel.gaiahost.coop with esmtp; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:00:01 -0500 id 00534068.45648212.00007EB4 Received: by gaiahost.coop (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:00:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:00:02 -0500 From: Mark Bucciarelli To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20061122170002.GA2988@rabbit> Mail-Followup-To: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS Performance Numbers X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:00:47 -0000 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:43:49PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > Mark Bucciarelli wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:52:47AM -0200, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: > > > > > > The results were discussed in the following threads: > > > > > > > I see the speed differences are major, but don't have a good > > idea of what 15,000 DNS queries per second means. Is the > > following interpretation correct? > > > Means: as I see the 'numbers', they roughly show the > performance of an untuned TCP/IP stack and/or of the speed the > kernel can handle the 'subject of being tested for'. [...] > My purposes for the specific OS may be not very common and not that > specific to DNS. I'm going to build a DNS server in the next couple weeks, and the difference between 6.1 and 4.11 in Marcelo's tests was dramatic. Are you saying Marcelo's test results do not apply to my situation? [...] > i did and do not care about 10% or 15% of > performance gain or > drainage if I could stay with the familiar OS I agree 100% with this idea, and that is why I am trying to get a better gut sense if this performance difference really matters for my application (web and email servers). Thanks, m