From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 18:54:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F5816A473; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piso@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from mail.oltrelinux.com (krisma.oltrelinux.com [194.242.226.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA0B13C448; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piso@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from newluxor.wired.org (ip-67-154.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.67.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.oltrelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF3511AE90; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:54:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from piso@localhost) by newluxor.wired.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5IIsZvA002319; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:54:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from piso) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:54:34 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati To: "M. Warner Losh" , simokawa@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, wsk@gddsn.org.cn, mobile@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070618185434.GB2183@tin.it> References: <46734A3E.3010903@gddsn.org.cn> <626eb4530706160525o54234621s2de098e64cdeb4fe@mail.gmail.com> <20070616.173306.199376574.imp@bsdimp.com> <20070617024935.GU4602@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070617024935.GU4602@funkthat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at krisma.oltrelinux.com Cc: Subject: Re: kernel panic with pccard insert on recent 7.0 CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:54:40 -0000 On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 07:49:35PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Warner Losh wrote this message on Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 17:33 -0600: > > Also, I'm unclear on the difference between FILTER_STRAY and > > FILTER_HANDLED. > > The interrupt filter is suppose to return one of FILTER_STRAY or > FILTER_HANDLED... If you _HANDLED it return that, otherwise return > _STRAY... If you need to schedule the ithread, return _HANDLED or'd > with _SCHEDULE_THREAD... right. > I thought piso fixed the comments, but apparently he hasn't (or hasn't > finished committing the patch that includes the comment fixes)... The > comments in bus.h are incorrect... http://people.freebsd.org/~piso/bus.h.diff http://people.freebsd.org/~piso/BUS_SETUP_INTR.9.diff bye, P.