Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 May 2000 18:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Anatoly Vorobey <mellon@pobox.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Proper uses for MFS?
Message-ID:  <200005260132.SAA85214@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <200005251705.NAA67491@blackhelicopters.org> <200005251757.KAA83404@apollo.backplane.com> <20000525141623.D6776@sasami.jurai.net> <200005252022.NAA84015@apollo.backplane.com> <20000525140446.J28594@fw.wintelcom.net> <200005260023.RAA84903@apollo.backplane.com> <20000525180718.N28594@fw.wintelcom.net> <200005260128.SAA85153@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

::Unfortunatly we're out of mount flags.  Mike Smith had some interesting
::ideas to extend the mount structure, I'll see what works.
::
::-- 
::-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
:
:    What about making it a tunefs flag?  That is, make it filesystem-based
:    rather then mount-based.
:
:					-Matt

    Scrap that last thought.  A tunefs flag is silly for something like
    this :-)

					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005260132.SAA85214>