From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 25 18:32:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F8B37B7E2 for ; Thu, 25 May 2000 18:32:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA85214; Thu, 25 May 2000 18:32:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 18:32:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200005260132.SAA85214@apollo.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein , Anatoly Vorobey , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proper uses for MFS? References: <200005251705.NAA67491@blackhelicopters.org> <200005251757.KAA83404@apollo.backplane.com> <20000525141623.D6776@sasami.jurai.net> <200005252022.NAA84015@apollo.backplane.com> <20000525140446.J28594@fw.wintelcom.net> <200005260023.RAA84903@apollo.backplane.com> <20000525180718.N28594@fw.wintelcom.net> <200005260128.SAA85153@apollo.backplane.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ::Unfortunatly we're out of mount flags. Mike Smith had some interesting ::ideas to extend the mount structure, I'll see what works. :: ::-- ::-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] : : What about making it a tunefs flag? That is, make it filesystem-based : rather then mount-based. : : -Matt Scrap that last thought. A tunefs flag is silly for something like this :-) Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message