From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 19 16:27:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CFE1065676; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265778FC0A; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0JGRZ0X043796; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:27:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <20100119155920.GU64905@hoeg.nl> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:27:34 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <02BD244A-E287-46E0-B6A4-B6643CA7BA2E@samsco.org> References: <201001191531.o0JFVI6n029716@svn.freebsd.org> <9FF943CE-9FCB-48C8-A048-23F23620F4E5@samsco.org> <20100119155920.GU64905@hoeg.nl> To: Ed Schouten X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r202628 - in head: . sys/amd64/amd64 sys/i386/i386 sys/i386/xen sys/sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:27:43 -0000 On Jan 19, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi Scott, > > * Scott Long wrote: >> Ok, so you've broken a legitimate piece of compatibility. What's the >> gain? > > That we no longer have a blend of GNU and ISO C inline throughout our > entire source tree, making the code more accessible for alternative > compilers. > Which compilers? Is this a requirement for CLANG? Or is it just a nice-to-have clean-up? Scott