From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug 27 00:30:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA16536
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 00:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA16529
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 00:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pf1.phil.uni-sb.de (root@pf1.phil.uni-sb.de [134.96.82.11])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA29830
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 00:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7])
	by pf1.phil.uni-sb.de (8.8.6/8.8.6/961001chris) with ESMTP id JAA08171
	for <saar-lists-freebsd-hackers@news.phil.uni-sb.de>; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:30:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from wong.rogerswave.ca by relay2.UU.NET with ESMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: wong.rogerswave.ca [204.92.17.32])
	id QQdejl09273; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 03:29:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from wong@localhost) by wong.rogerswave.ca (8.8.5/8.7.3) id CAA00628; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 02:26:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 02:26:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ken Wong <wong@a17b32.rogerswave.ca>
X-Sender: wong@wong.rogerswave.ca
Reply-To: wong@rogerswave.ca
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: Screwinup <screwinup@aol.com>, saar-lists-freebsd-hackers@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Anarchists decry 72lbs plutonium launch
In-Reply-To: <199708250313.UAA00633@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970827021504.449A-100000@wong.rogerswave.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Sun, 24 Aug 1997, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Finally, the waste materials from a coal or petroleum fired power
> plant don't break down, period, unless acted upon by a highly

maybe it doen't breakdown atomically but far from carefree.
for example, good atom like O2 and energetic one like C are exposed
to heat, they become CO2 if you are lucky, and CO.  none of those
are good for the envronment and youself.

> energetic process.  One taking more energy than was originally
> produced (it's called "entropy", kids); take an elementry chemistry

not always, if you have anti-matter.