From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 2 05:24:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6465106566B; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 05:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356828FC08; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 05:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [99.48.191.9]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 15E638FC4E; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 09:24:11 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C8D423985D; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:24:04 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Doug Barton Message-Id: <20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB51B5B.1050606@FreeBSD.org> References: <4BB51B5B.1050606@FreeBSD.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__1_Apr_2010_22_24_04_-0700_JeELB8c2KyR9N.sP" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Results of BIND RFC X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:24:13 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__1_Apr_2010_22_24_04_-0700_JeELB8c2KyR9N.sP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:16:59 -0700 Doug Barton mentioned: >=20 > Of course this change will have some costs. Users of named who rely on > the current defaults will have some change management to deal with, > however the costs will be minimal. The one area that has come up > repeatedly in previous discussions about this topic is that users like > having access to the command line tools dig, host, and nslookup. To deal > with that issue I will be creating a bind-tools port so that those who > want just those tools can easily add them, without the overhead of the > rest of the BIND suite. If anyone has suggestions for other BIND tools > that should be included in the port, please let me know. Hey, Doug! While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision. How hard it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the=20 critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving the rest of it (the server itself and supporting tools) to the port? --=20 Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE --Signature=_Thu__1_Apr_2010_22_24_04_-0700_JeELB8c2KyR9N.sP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLtX95AAoJEL8lojEJL9nwbJgQALOXVTF3xaj0lDVAsXtgFSWJ nYYts36/Msoe9AE8lTWoFnXsXfkLPaaqkcLOu7mGwBOIbbJ7ZfSY/KgTiUdEuha+ dXglF6dWmPfVO+ROZNtwE3MgCKdWR4o8/X/iAfyTKEf7L1exoRHdObLBUXQuYtmn 5mzORU84C6PkAyuJ6NIAs2A56yCmQv7L5fd3shDErkj5yMmF43dobnXBIeFPg8h2 Jo61HA6EhnZ4fvxcgPe9pkEAk2k2XQQYwY+aXVXGLHzuBI1P2WSFG48eB1eNG8cp 6rWMSirJrhKG7PzHSzVgUZ0PDWfQl9syRCJupNyAXHmP+f3dFguecvCmDADtnn3W js79ZkftYSHo++okUC1nXImh4ow8Z0RZ5xYAl4NYbgkAq7Pe3rMr5UADD/GwTM5w O/QRPRU4cPjBMAAANPyZXXSliuIk21CDbSL1Li/jI44Z+PJK/qSCGQxvZRsjgEnC C6HC4/dXT90NzHkNYUATlD9JjqCP92B89qikBA7nbbiq4uhcTUuvOMTcI8apAhj6 xT/Rr14BzCXTj1Ojr2HA4aCYc1PNdH4nVWDogiy9yIfopwEtTcUnz76UJRZXq8RA 2pWekU5uHjtk6IDfxfGXnDTM1HPKDk3mmiZU3nmojEnuG/0lvPHZ6suzEIE3X6fa 6A4HEP9NuTKm+ckCl+rj =J0FH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__1_Apr_2010_22_24_04_-0700_JeELB8c2KyR9N.sP--