Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:01:19 -0600 From: Brad Davis <so14k@so14k.com> To: steve Rieger <steve@n2sw.com> Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) Message-ID: <20050531140119.GC90363@ender.liquidneon.com> In-Reply-To: <b751e0fadb45476a621d49a3bc9e3be3@n2sw.com> References: <BAY21-F14C8EE506B422EAB90338DAE040@phx.gbl> <b751e0fadb45476a621d49a3bc9e3be3@n2sw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:20:59AM -0400, steve Rieger wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster
> >with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is
> >
> >ext_if="fxp0"
> >internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }"
> >rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 ->
> >$internal_smtp_servers round-robin sticky-address
> >
> >If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4
> >from its table.
> >
> >Regards
> >Sunil Sunder Raj
> >
>
> check out vrrp
VRRP is for redundant routers.
Regards,
Brad Davis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050531140119.GC90363>