From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep  8 19:25:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA25489
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 19:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca8-21.ix.netcom.com [207.93.141.149])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA25484
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 19:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id TAA12721; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 19:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 19:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709090224.TAA12721@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com
CC: hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <19970907160423.39071@klemm.gtn.com> (message from Andreas Klemm on Sun, 7 Sep 1997 16:04:23 +0200)
Subject: Re: what do you think ... should/could ports move to -> /usr/local/ports ?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * putting the ports collection to /usr/local/ports would be cleaner,
 * than using /usr/ports.

(1) Use a symlink or just put it anywhere you want and define PORTSDIR 
    in /etc/make.conf.

(2) Why do you send this message to "hackers"?

Satoshi