From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 17 14:43:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7AE37B74E for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:43:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.30 2000/06/08 18:25:35 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id OAA25015; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:43:21 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id OAA01388; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:43:21 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id RAA07628; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:43:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14707.32248.146185.256812@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:43:20 -0700 (MST) To: Richard Stanaford Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bioscall.s In-Reply-To: <20000717213203.7240.qmail@web3102.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20000717213203.7240.qmail@web3102.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Monday, July 17, Richard Stanaford wrote: ] > > I have looked at both .. > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/branches/4.0-stable/src/UPDATING > ftp://cvsup2.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/branches/4.0-stable/src/UPDATING > > And I see nothing regarding bioscall.s. If it's not much bother (I have to > wonder given the tone of your response) please indicate where this has been > documented. Actually, without CVSUP'ing the sources or whatever, the best way to look at "up to date" sources (IMO) is the CVS repos. web interface. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/UPDATING Click on the link for the version branded RELENG_4 to get -STABLE's most recent copy: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/UPDATING?rev=1.73.2.8 The section on date 20000706 says it all (pretty much). There's nothing specifically mentioning bioscall.s -BUT- with the binutils update (meaning assembler, linker, blah blah blah) there had to be changes made to it. Without an updated "binutils" you can't assemble the file. The "buildkernel" target takes care of these sorts of wierd dependencies that crop up from time to time. The "tone" comes from frustration at what transpired with the binutils update into -STABLE and the whole "buildkernel" discussion. Look back into the mailing list archives for "buildkernel" and you'll find a whole huge thread about it. The developers just want people who "track -stable" to "read -stable" ... -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message