From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 31 07:43:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1280E7C02 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mafsys1234@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46L7cm286pz48xb for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mafsys1234@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id u17so4669854pgi.6 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 00:43:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rhXiz4+j9KB4v2B8i1uAUSMme8DRIR1kPBgFmoorXcA=; b=HW5rYw7DPzIKLbLbN7SPVEMSTu40nC5ztPXHOUgU6fvs6B2wJzh53BfUR5s7G+ptFU ItsVz5k6rRwKiY0ObQscXZbRrZHVtUmfoLE5YyQxNf+FtNdTkud2MCJCW55r052V9xoH 1y1WxFQ5DreD4tB55JpkksGJgSC8f3D1wWYXK5v2sEYHTlclgYt5WdLX3lZGPsHIh/s6 qeDq0oCEpbi111Gty40Z45sHLw9IWL5nQ+eDPmrKEVInzibv54PjP/lxXi3K/soC98JI DQHs3nWFl14vxxLqITQlcI27nc0IFrG0edpFaYI0jzwaCUknqw55a/vGKnvegvjLcQSd qToA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rhXiz4+j9KB4v2B8i1uAUSMme8DRIR1kPBgFmoorXcA=; b=TRrHHNcl7xf7HRdfh9Wb/gJYNwlVAL2+VumSnXWztyMfXa+6S5SI5VsqFD6Rb867ZT snzumn0Ml/Pz228/TX8TcH0/QAoM+8J59mPWwz7bMrsMVfeK6NcqDLFwVVX2aCYoCMpY 8dNSUtUU0GjPBYTlNU+LbBV/JVorbhTtvhrW1euvyGS7qpTQbb8qN39G3BuKuusDC48c puowDCA8AwKZNNk4LhXT2orThNLz/ykXub6VhFZjugvHrbihI0jLsVHmdji4yJ7SMxm4 QdB/j3aJwZXKq+TGLsP/Lmn2FtoRF6PEbByoBkfhaVDrqCRM/QT3cNLqdlyszXrQ/huy xInw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVOKgoTnNywHM1zcsfM3YoHcAa/TTC5GV3StSsDjUlGZG+rKDIS fgiFSpQ5nhn9F56VGIo8HzZKLE48K2U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0u9S9w3K9LSLvd2CdcI3cPXeWqLZLWK8+eHhjThHOQDBirUtbWsJcAiHzdjmvV9WBLNSSQg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8a8a:: with SMTP id x10mr2523138pjn.83.1567237398621; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 00:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (C-210-10-136-89.can.connect.net.au. [210.10.136.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm6988011pjv.30.2019.08.31.00.43.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 31 Aug 2019 00:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: ruby 2.4.7,1 considered vulnerable? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=c3=b8l?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: MJ Message-ID: <531cf12d-0038-ec72-f173-033d7b2d44ba@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:43:03 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46L7cm286pz48xb X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HW5rYw7D; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mafsys1234@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::531 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mafsys1234@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.995,0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[89.136.10.210.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.17), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.84), asn: 15169(-2.31), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:43:21 -0000 On 31/08/2019 5:09 pm, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > Is this to be expected? > > $ pkg audit -Fr > vulnxml file up-to-date > ruby-2.4.7,1 is vulnerable: > RDoc -- multiple jQuery vulnerabilities > CVE: CVE-2015-9251 > CVE: CVE-2012-6708 > WWW: https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/ed8d5535-ca78-11e9-980b-999ff59c22ea.html > > Packages that depend on ruby: ruby24-bdb, dtrace-toolkit, portupgrade > > 1 problem(s) in 1 installed package(s) found. > > Given this entry in /var/db/pkg/vuln.xml, I expected 2.4.7,1 to be one > of the corrected versions: > > > ruby > 2.4.02.4.7,1 > 2.5.02.5.6,1 > 2.6.02.6.3,1 > > > The link for vuxml.FreeBSD.org agrees with me on this one: > > Affected packages > 2.4.0 <= ruby < 2.4.7,1 > 2.5.0 <= ruby < 2.5.6,1 > 2.6.0 <= ruby < 2.6.3,1 > rubygem-rdoc < 6.1.2 > > Could this be a bug in pkg(8)? If the fix for the vulnerability is in 2.4.7 then it would seem that way. Given the liberal use of portepoch in the package versions I expect the maintainer has got confused. Indeed perhaps it's the portepoch that's causing the issue. Perhaps contact the maintainer to get it worked through?