From owner-freebsd-fs Tue Feb 6 11:51:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192A337B401; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:51:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f16Jo9345186; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:50:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 11:51:11 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Boris Popov Subject: RE: vnode interlock API Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 06-Feb-01 Boris Popov wrote: > Hello, > > Few months ago simple locks used for vnode interlock were replaced > by mutexes. It causes additional pain for externally maintained > filesystems and lowers portability of the code between -stable and > -current. Sounds good. -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message