From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 19 18:46:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAB4106564A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:46:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AB68FC15 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.wifi.locolomo.org (gamma.wifi.locolomo.org [172.16.1.5]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 978421C0841; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DD5657A.3030008@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:46:18 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <4DD37DDA.1090107@locolomo.org> <4dd4c55b.y99nUfzO1JLxPrYI%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <8333A2FC-7F31-45FB-AD56-951FA349737F@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <8333A2FC-7F31-45FB-AD56-951FA349737F@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" , perryh@pluto.rain.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD compatible mini-itx board X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:46:20 -0000 On 19/5/11 7:49 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > FreeBSD ought to support the 945G chipset and the ICH7 hub; also the RealTek NIC, but the latter isn't the highest quality NIC around. yeah, I'd rather have Intels own NIC dunno why they can't put them on their own boards. Realtek seem to be on all the Intel boards :S At least I'm adding an Intel PCI NIC. >>> Also: The Intel manual mentions: "Support for DDR2 533 MHz SO-DIMMs (DDR2 800 MHz and DDR2 667 MHz validated to run at 533 MHz only)" >>> Will faster RAM result in a less stable system? > > It indicates that they put faster RAM into the box, but ran it at a speed of 533MHz, which is slower than the memory is capable of running. In some cases, doing this lets you run the RAM at lower voltage or with tighter timing settings of CL/tRCD/tTP/etc. Thanks, currently I have, well ancient RAM on an old VIA board and it's not really any reliable. That with the flacky disk controller on the VIA board is my reason to go Intel. > Regards, Thanks, Erik