From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 20 04:17:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD6515D33F8; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "eg.sd.rdtc.ru", Issuer "eg.sd.rdtc.ru" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB9869EA3; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:17:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5K4H9Dr097525 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:17:09 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) To: "Rodney W. Grimes" References: <201906192332.x5JNWQxB020511@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: freebsd-net , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , "Ronald F. Guilmette" From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <94c95322-700e-422f-1358-19d577a8b15c@grosbein.net> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:17:00 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201906192332.x5JNWQxB020511@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CCB9869EA3 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.74 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.57)[-0.575,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[greylisted]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.74)[0.739,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.17)[0.174,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[country: RU(0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29072, ipnet:2a03:3100::/32, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:17:32 -0000 20.06.2019 6:32, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>> I've not run a userland without V6 in a long time once I started to have >>> issues with some things. >> >> Can you give an example of such script in base system, please? >> >> If you have such script or binary not in our base, it's not our fault :-) > > That is an extremly aragant position to take. Your basically saying that > only the base system scripts have to function correctly and that any > script not part of the base system has no need to be supported. > > Go tell this to the ports people... *sigh* I'm saying that areas of responsibility should be denoted. If there is some script in the world written with bad assumptions, its author/maintainer is responsible in fixing it. FreeBSD already provides sysctls kern.features.inet and kern.features.inet6 to make it easier for scripts.