From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 23:48:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E95337B401 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topaz.ad1810.com (topaz.ad1810.com [212.204.230.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC55043FBD for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:48:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from k7.mavetju (topaz.ad1810.com [212.204.230.141]) by topaz.ad1810.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6572BA01; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 50F2B6A7101; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:47:56 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:47:56 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030422064756.GM762@k7.mavetju> References: <003b01c307f5$8c936e00$0480763e@semhome> <1050982709.421032.879.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> <20030422062152.GA18011@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030422063428.GM808@k7.mavetju> <20030422064014.GA62078@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030422064014.GA62078@rot13.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade & RO ports tree (was Re: [kris@freebsd.org: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk]) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 06:48:02 -0000 On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 11:40:14PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:34:28PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:38:29AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote: > > > > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > > > Hm, execuse me my sarcasm, but do we really need the second portupgrade > > > > > > in C??? > > > > > > > > > > I see two main reasons: > > > > > 1) portupgrade is not in base system and never be there because of ruby. > > > > > 2) Because it is in ruby :) > > > > 3) Because it do not works on RO mounted /usr/ports > > > > > > It does. I have always run it in such a setup. > > > > No, it should. And ports which fail to build because of this should > > be fixed to use the WRKDIRPREFIX variable. > > > > Kris, can we have a run of the ports-package system with a RO > > /usr/ports to see which ports fail because of this? > > It always has, and none of them do :) In that case, I stand corrected. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php