Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:28:28 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r315623 - head/benchmarks/mdtest Message-ID: <CADLo8383kQ4LYF4%2BOG6riKpF7xWrf7WAu1ELg6S8403B14H5-w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=Xgay=J=Jid=17iVH4XRaO8goraK7DMY7fuM1KN75dqA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201303301854.r2UIsYxc030098@svn.freebsd.org> <51573566.4030303@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxg=Xgay=J=Jid=17iVH4XRaO8goraK7DMY7fuM1KN75dqA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 March 2013 00:45, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 30 March 2013 14:56, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On 3/30/2013 1:54 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> Author: eadler >>> Date: Sat Mar 30 18:54:34 2013 >>> New Revision: 315623 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/315623 >>> >>> Log: >>> Distfile reroll: Checked against upstream sourceforge >> >> Would be helpful to know what changed in these type of commits. Just >> because the upstream SF has a changed file doesn't mean it's OK to use. > > Agreed, but I could not find the old distfile to compare against. > I'm aware of the issues involved. How could you be sure it's still OK? http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/mdtest-tarball-vs-cvs-experimental_1_8_3.diff This diff is against the latest code in CVS (the tag experimental_1_8_3); it appears upstream isn't actually versioning their code there any more. There appears to have been no malicious code added. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo8383kQ4LYF4%2BOG6riKpF7xWrf7WAu1ELg6S8403B14H5-w>