From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  6 22:04:43 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0BE1065673;
	Sun,  6 Nov 2011 22:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964B0179520;
	Sun,  6 Nov 2011 22:04:13 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4EB7126C.3030809@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:04:12 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
References: <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es>
	<j8u2af$chv$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<5C156A63-D86D-4C1B-AFC4-DC5EA09494F6@xerq.net>
	<4EB3C63F.2060805@quip.cz> <20111104141626.GA28925@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111104141626.GA28925@freebsd.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>,
	Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:04:43 -0000

On 11/04/2011 07:16, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Nov  4 11, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>> Matt Connor wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Ivan Voras<ivoras@freebsd.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/11/2011 12:57, Borja Marcos wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> Did you forget to do "make clean" after "make install" on several large
>>>> ports?
>>>>
>>>> But yes, the ports tree is getting a bit unwieldy. On the other hand,
>>>> did you fsck the file system lately?
>>>>
>>>
>>> cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade&&  make install clean
>>>
>>> portsclean -CD
>>>
>>> That's a quick way to clean out all the clutter.
>>
>> Installing ruby and portupgrade is really big overhead to simple task, 
>> which can be done by:
>>
>> cd /usr/ports && make clean
>>
>> or with find:
>>
>> find /usr/ports/ -depth 3 -name "work" -exec rm -r {} +
> 
> ...or with 'rm -rf /usr/ports/*/*/work'

This comes up periodically, and for some reason no one pays attention to
all the work that's been done in the past to verify that the fastest
method is:

find /usr/ports -maxdepth 3 -type d -name -work -exec rm -rf {} \;

Of course, the best solution by far is to set WRKDIRPREFIX to a path
with adequate space, preferably something other than /usr/obj.


hth,

Doug

-- 

		"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
		"Too practical."

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/