From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 28 08:07:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E51416A4CE; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:07:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk [129.215.144.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E4E43F85; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:07:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk) Received: (from richard@localhost) by rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) id QAA08679; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:07:13 GMT Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:07:13 GMT Message-Id: <200310281607.QAA08679@rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> From: Richard Tobin To: deischen@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt In-Reply-To: Daniel Eischen's message of Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:33:25 -0500 (EST) Organization: just say no cc: Jordan K Hubbard cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:07:16 -0000 > > I think ISO-C is pretty clear here. It would be wise to raise this on comp.std.c which is read by several of the ISO C standard authors. Things that seem "pretty clear" often turn out not to be... -- Richard