From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 22 14:52:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB0016A41F for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:52:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phelms1@mindspring.com) Received: from pop03.mail.atl.earthlink.net (pop03.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AABB43D48 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:52:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phelms1@mindspring.com) Received: from dialup-4.227.193.48.dial1.denver1.level3.net ([4.227.193.48] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by pop03.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1E7Dej-0004nD-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:52:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4309E6A0.9040403@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:52:16 -0600 From: Phil Helms User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian G References: <20050822054110.GC6627@osiris.chen.org.nz> <430989AB.7090200@nefli.nl> <4309D516.6060004@mindspring.com> <4309DFF3.4060702@iang.org> <4309E0A1.3090806@mindspring.com> <4309E4E2.7010600@iang.org> In-Reply-To: <4309E4E2.7010600@iang.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0534-0, 08/22/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Starting with freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: phelms1@mindspring.com List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:52:12 -0000 I assume there's some sort of license that allows Linux distros to include Java in compiled form. If that's so, then what's preventing FreeBSD from having the same thing? The difficulty of performing the test suite? Ian G wrote: > > Java *is* ported to FreeBSD, and is these days quite > snappy about it. Problem is, there is no permission > to distribute a port in Package form. You can quite > happily make yourself a Package, though. > -- Phil Helms phelms1@mindspring.com