From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Wed Aug 21 14:35:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768EBCA14B for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (hotblack.vangyzen.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46D9Dg362Jz41wV for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from disco.vangyzen.net (unknown [70.97.188.230]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47E905649D for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:35:08 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Inter-VM networking with FreeBSD under bhyve References: <201908201547.x7KFlfgO049668@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> From: Eric van Gyzen To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Message-ID: <099cc2bb-2647-d012-ca27-f57a99b49010@vangyzen.net> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:35:07 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201908201547.x7KFlfgO049668@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46D9Dg362Jz41wV X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eric@vangyzen.net designates 2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=eric@vangyzen.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.24 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[vangyzen.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.96)[ip: (-7.09), ipnet: 2607:fc50:1000::/36(-3.79), asn: 36236(-3.87), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:fc50:1000::/36, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:35:16 -0000 Thanks for the replies, everyone. > Do you have any desired parameters? > Performance Driven? Simplicity? I failed to mention that. I'm interested in performance, especially low CPU overhead. I had tried vale+tap on a stable/12 host, but it wouldn't pass traffic, so I started this thread as a feeler for what was expected to work on which branches. Since then, I updated the host to head, and vale+tap works. I'm very interested in vale+ptnetmap. It seems to be partially committed to head, but not entirely. Is that right? Thanks again. Eric