From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 7 11:16:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B70106566C; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaap@bartok.nlnetlabs.nl) Received: from bartok.nlnetlabs.nl (bartok.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:216:76ff:feb8:3c02]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA5D8FC1A; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bartok.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bartok.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB7BGB7E063399; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:16:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@bartok.nlnetlabs.nl) Message-Id: <200912071116.nB7BGB7E063399@bartok.nlnetlabs.nl> To: miwi@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <200912060111.nB61BLRB037482@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200912060111.nB61BLRB037482@freefall.freebsd.org> Comments: In-reply-to miwi@FreeBSD.org message dated "Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:11:21 +0000." Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:16:11 +0100 From: Jaap Akkerhuis X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (bartok.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:16:11 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, MISSING_MID autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bartok.nlnetlabs.nl Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/141208: [patch] - update dns/drill X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:16:23 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] - update dns/drill Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->miwi Responsible-Changed-By: miwi Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Dec 6 01:11:21 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=141208 I just checked and I mistaken, the proposed patch is against the official update. So yes, I approve this patch. jaap