Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:41:40 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Argument list too long Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303081837520.91388@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838hgKciKpDTFtjguu-YUmxH7cb_1=KXM6bb%2B3qgtf784w@mail.gmail.com> References: <82112.1362671436.13776555968178880512@ffe17.ukr.net> <20130307161546.GV47829@e-new.0x20.net> <20130308190917.GA34838@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303081239450.89649@wonkity.com> <CADLo838hgKciKpDTFtjguu-YUmxH7cb_1=KXM6bb%2B3qgtf784w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Chris Rees wrote:
> > For fun, after running each of these several times to preload cache:
> >
> > find /usr/ports -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -H "X-PHP-Script"
> > 40.98 seconds (average)
> >
> > find /usr/ports -type f -exec grep -H "X-PHP-Script" {} \+
> > 42.27 seconds (average)
> >
> > So they aren't too different in performance.
>
> The \+ form I have also found impossible to achieve in csh, which is why I never recommend it.
Do you mean in scripted form? It works in interactive csh, that's what
I used for this test.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1303081837520.91388>