From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 10:15:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D8E106566C for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (lerwick.hopto.org [204.51.112.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600AE8FC18 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67419 invoked by uid 98); 20 Oct 2010 09:53:27 +0000 Received: from 81.187.141.93 by mailserver (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.96.1/11509. spamassassin: 3.3.1. Clear:RC:1(81.187.141.93):. Processed in 0.025012 secs); 20 Oct 2010 09:53:27 -0000 Received: from 93.141.187.81.in-addr.arpa (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (81.187.141.93) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 09:53:27 +0000 From: Craig Butler To: Michael Moll In-Reply-To: <20101019212043.GA38362@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> References: <20101019212043.GA38362@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:49:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1287568144.2392.10.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Has anybody been working on zfsboot for sparc64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:15:59 -0000 On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 23:20 +0200, Michael Moll wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:41:26AM +0800, Gavin Mu wrote: > > It seems that booting from ZFS is not supported on sparc64, has > > anybody been working on this? Thanks. > > There has been a discussion about this topic some months ago, see > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/2010-July/007330.html > and the following mails. It seems nobody stepped up, yet. > > Regards Does it really need to be implemented ?? zfs root with ufs /boot is working great. Personally I push a minimal install onto the ufs partition then dump-restore onto tank when created... I keep the data on the ufs partition and just link in boot directory into the tank; http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSOnRoot You can even gmirror the ufs partition between HDD's If the zfs ever messes up, you still have a workable system available via the ufs partition. I don't fully see the advantages of a fully zfs system including the /boot. Thanks Craig B