From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 27 12:26:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4651D16A492 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E5643D45 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:26:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so576229uge for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:26:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=GGrPEHES3cuiahSbBgzD8yvWPW53YP/Asq3l9QpPwT1t1EQdwmOyRkfAY5YtnIY8o4hIZ3/9bSXsi9PyAudfOJ6PK/Nn4WNQLEijgUykNTz1LXPKWWLe9bhOXfri3sCSHpAEjyYUIwOuZV537k+L4ccORfK708tgGT/7zPZhU+g= Received: by 10.78.203.13 with SMTP id a13mr3743044hug; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:26:54 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Christopher Boumenot" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9209ed88840638db Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port_history - track port commit message comments X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:26:57 -0000 On 10/27/06, Christopher Boumenot wrote: > Every time I upgrade a port I am usually left wondering what changed. Some other projects maintain special package-specific ChangeLog files. Maybe VCS logs is not the best place for documentation, because it's not as easily accessible as a flat file would be. Moreover, I think porters don't document the hacks they have to employ - just because there's nowhere to do that.