From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 22 22:28:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C210E16A403 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from blake.polstra.com (blake.polstra.com [64.81.189.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C1B13C460 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from strings.polstra.com (strings.polstra.com [64.81.189.67]) by blake.polstra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBMM5XxD040587; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:05:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.5 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <458C2E51.50605@rogers.com> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:05:33 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra To: Mike Jakubik Cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Dell SC1435 likely to work with FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:28:05 -0000 On 22-Dec-2006 Mike Jakubik wrote: > John Polstra wrote: >> Do any of you have an opinion as to whether the new Dell SC1435 is >> likely to work with FreeBSD (either 6.x or -current)? I don't think >> they're shipping yet, so I doubt anybody has actually tried it. The >> machine has Opteron 2200 series CPUs with a Broadcom HT-2100 and >> HT-1000 chipset, according to the spec sheet. >> > > I've been waiting for support of this chipset for quite some time. It > was promised by Scott L months ago, but i've been unable to get any > feedback on the status. Do you know if this is supported on 6.2? I just booted the 6.2-RC1 install CD on the system, and it seems to work fine. It recognized the SATA controller, the hard drive, and the network ports, and the outputs from fdisk and disklabel were correct. I didn't see any signs of problems. I've been running -current on the system for a week or two without any problems. John