From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Aug 28 12:48:41 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id MAA22441
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 12:48:41 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA22433
          ; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 12:48:39 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA14566; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 12:48:36 -0700
To: paul@FreeBSD.org
cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: copyright notices for ports/packages 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Aug 1995 20:30:14 BST."
             <199508281930.UAA10677@server.netcraft.co.uk> 
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 12:48:35 -0700
Message-ID: <14563.809639315@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> It's not up to us to require that end-users keep the copyrights
> lying around after the binaries are installed. Whether we leave
> them sitting in the source directory or move them to some central
> place makes no difference to that point.

Huh?  If the user wants to print out a copyright statement for a port
or package, and it's certainly reasonable to assume that the two
should be kept together, then it most definitely DOES make a
difference! If we just leave them in the src directory then they'll
get blown away by a clean.

					Jordan