From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 12 16:44:02 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A849316A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:44:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from saturn.criticalmagic.com (saturn.criticalmagic.com
	[64.74.124.105])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5999743D49
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:44:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rcoleman@criticalmagic.com)
Received: from [10.40.30.75] (delta.ciphertrust.com [216.235.158.34])
	by saturn.criticalmagic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709B83BD21;
	Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:44:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <41E553EB.10809@criticalmagic.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:44:27 -0500
From: Richard Coleman <rcoleman@criticalmagic.com>
Organization: Critical Magic
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr>
	<20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net>
	<20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<41E54C51.4000300@fer.hr> <20050112164022.GD28786@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050112164022.GD28786@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Subject: Re: MFC wishlist
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:44:02 -0000

Brooks Davis wrote:
>>>>>> It's been a while now and (judging from this list at
>>>>>> least), people are not complaining about ULE, so maybe
>>>>>> (with re@ approval) the fix & supporting infrastructure
>>>>>> could be brought to RELENG_5?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's not a good idea.  I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on
>> 
>>>> This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff
>>>> has
>> 
>>> I'm talking about 6-CURRENT.  My last kernel/world build is
>> 
>> Are there plans for assigning more priority/resources on solving
>> this? Maybe mark it as show-stopper for 5.4? (it's currently not
>> even on the http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html list)
> 
> 
> No, because the project has no ability to "assign
> priority/resources". If someone who has is intrested and capable time
> to work on it, does so in time, then it may be done, if not, it
> won't.
> 
> -- Brooks

Should we take this to mean that none of the developers are interested 
in ULE any more?  That's the general feeling I get these days.  Just 
curious.

Richard Coleman
rcoleman@criticalmagic.com